The Walking Dead Genealogy: Unsubstantiated Criticisms of Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS) and the Failure to Put Them to Rest

Kristi Jackson, Trena Paulus, Nicholas H Woolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The authors conduct an exposé on the deterministic denunciations of Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS) and how citation errors keep these criticisms alive. They use a zombie metaphor to describe more than two decades of battling these seemingly mindless assessments of QDAS that keep coming –despite their decay – and simply will not die. Focusing exclusively on the criticism of separation/distancing, which alleges that the computer and the software interfere with the researcher’s familiarity with the data, the authors trace one current strand of this criticism through a literature genealogy. Three citation errors (half-truth, proxy, and hearsay) are identified to help dismantle the criticism that QDAS inevitably and negatively interferes with the researchers’ connection to the data. The article concludes with a reckoning about the role of QDAS experts in perpetuating these citation errors and provides four specific recommendations for all qualitative researchers; suggestions that amount to a more viable avenue for pursuing a cure.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalDefault journal
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 6 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ATLAS.ti
  • CAQDAS
  • Citation Error
  • Distancing
  • Literature Genealogy
  • NVivo
  • QDAS
  • Qualitative Data Analysis Software
  • Separation
  • Zombie

Disciplines

  • Discourse and Text Linguistics
  • Other Arts and Humanities
  • Other Rhetoric and Composition
  • Publishing
  • Scholarly Publishing
  • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
  • Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education
  • Technical and Professional Writing

Cite this