TY - JOUR
T1 - What Works, When, for Whom, and with Whom: A Meta-Analytic Review of Predictors of Postsecondary Success for Students with Disabilities
AU - Haber, Mason G.
AU - Mazzotti, Valerie L.
AU - Mustian, April L.
AU - Rowe, Dawn A.
AU - Bartholomew, Audrey L.
AU - Test, David W.
AU - Fowler, Catherine H.
N1 - References Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, England: Wiley. Google Scholar Cooksey, E. C., Rindfuss, R. R. (2001). Patterns of work and schooling in young adulthood. Sociological Forum, 16, 731-755. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/684831?origin=JSTOR-pdf Google Scholar Driscoll, A. K.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Students with disabilities experience poorer post-school outcomes compared with their peers without disabilities. Existing experimental literature on “what works” for improving these outcomes is rare; however, a rapidly growing body of research investigates correlational relationships between experiences in school and post-school outcomes. A meta-analytic review provides means for assessing which experiences show the strongest relationships with long-term outcomes and variability in these relationships by outcome, research design, and population. This article presents a meta-analysis of in-school predictors of postsecondary employment, education, and independent living of youth with disabilities, examining 35 sources and 27 samples (N = 16,957) published from January of 1984 through May of 2010. Predictors showed differing relationships with education versus employment. Some of the least studied predictors, especially those involving multistakeholder collaboration, had larger effects than predictors more typically the focus of correlational research. Implications for future research and practice are considered.
AB - Students with disabilities experience poorer post-school outcomes compared with their peers without disabilities. Existing experimental literature on “what works” for improving these outcomes is rare; however, a rapidly growing body of research investigates correlational relationships between experiences in school and post-school outcomes. A meta-analytic review provides means for assessing which experiences show the strongest relationships with long-term outcomes and variability in these relationships by outcome, research design, and population. This article presents a meta-analysis of in-school predictors of postsecondary employment, education, and independent living of youth with disabilities, examining 35 sources and 27 samples (N = 16,957) published from January of 1984 through May of 2010. Predictors showed differing relationships with education versus employment. Some of the least studied predictors, especially those involving multistakeholder collaboration, had larger effects than predictors more typically the focus of correlational research. Implications for future research and practice are considered.
KW - in-school outcomes
KW - independent living
KW - meta-analysis
KW - post-school outcomes
KW - postsecondary education
KW - postsecondary employment
KW - predictors
KW - secondary transition
UR - https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315583135
U2 - 10.3102/0034654315583135
DO - 10.3102/0034654315583135
M3 - Article
VL - 86
JO - Review of Educational Research
JF - Review of Educational Research
ER -